I suspect there are a lot of women who are highly jealous of your ability to climax and reach orgasm so swiftly LOL, perhaps many men as well, especially the repeat part!

Though I believe the point is linked to ease of orgasm, the easier it is to orgasm the more incentivised you are to achieve it, the less easy it is the less incentivised. Because you can orgasm so easily inevitably you’re highly incentivised to want orgasm repeatedly.

But if it’s not easy to orgasm, which for the majority of women the evidence says it is not, for example, I had an ex-who even when masturbating alone she would struggle to achieve orgasm in less than an hour, when you do achieve orgasm you will be relieved and so will hold off trying again due to the difficulty in achieving orgasm.

So basically, if it’s easy to orgasm inevitably you’re going to want to do it frequently, but if it’s not, you’re going to need a strong incentive to go again and again.

Or so that is how the theory goes. But as ever, theories are theories! Though do remember that the theory looks at the past, think hundreds of thousands to millions of years back, which is a world where masturbation and things like that would not be viable for many many reasons. So it looks at the world where penetration was the only way people got in on. So think why make it easy for men to orgasm through penetration but not women. That’s the question the theory is aiming to answer.

So to really buy into the theory and understand it you would have to consider what effect removing all clitoral stimulation tools like masturbation et cetera and making sex penetration only would have on women’s desire for sex. Then in that world compare the effects orgasm et cetera would have on men and women, and how it would affect their desire for sex.

Anyhow, thanks for reading, and for your thoughts! Much appreciated :-)